Price & total cost
Score total cost of ownership — taxes, HOA, insurance, the roof the inspector politely mentioned — not the listing price. The listing price is the cover of the book.
Decision guide
The biggest purchase deserves more than a gut walkthrough.
Buy, keep renting, or pick between houses with a weighted decision matrix: price reality, location, condition, layout, and resale — plus the flip point that shows what would change your mind.
A typical should i buy this place? matrix, scored and totaled. The line under it is the part nobody does by hand: the exact weight change that would flip the winner.
Keep renting wins at 68%. Lower Condition & renovation risk by 2 points and Charming fixer wins instead.
Score total cost of ownership — taxes, HOA, insurance, the roof the inspector politely mentioned — not the listing price. The listing price is the cover of the book.
Everyone underestimates renovation by a factor of two on cost and three on time. Score your appetite for living in a construction site, because you will.
Life changes faster than mortgages. Weight this by how sure you are about the next five years — and if you're very sure, add a point of doubt anyway.
Walkthroughs are theater: fresh paint, rented furniture, cookies. The things you can't change — street noise, light angle, the neighbor's situation — deserve the highest scores' attention. Visit at 8am and 10pm before scoring 'location'.
Buying pressure makes renting look like failure. It's an option with real numbers: flexibility, zero maintenance, invested down payment. If renting wins your matrix, that's not settling — that's the answer the weights gave you.
If the verdict flips when 'price' drops one point, you have your negotiation strategy: the house is worth fighting for at a discount, not at asking. The flip point is the most honest number in the whole purchase.
Yes — call it what it is. 'I can picture Sunday mornings here' is a real input. Hiding it inside 'layout' corrupts two criteria. Giving it a weight of 3-4 lets it speak without letting it shout.
Score each house independently against 'price & total cost' rather than ranking them against each other. A 9-price house that scores low everywhere else should lose — that's the matrix catching the 'but it's such a deal!' trap.
Rates live inside 'price & total cost' as a scoring input, not a separate criterion — they change the number, not what you value. Re-score that one criterion when rates move and watch the verdict.