Community & friends
The criterion expats consistently underweight before moving and overweight after. Score the effort of rebuilding it, not the fantasy of instantly having it.
Decision guide
You can visit a city. You can't visit your life in it.
Choosing where to move? Weight cost of living, career, community, climate, and daily rhythm in a decision matrix — and see exactly what would have to change for the other city to win.
A typical where should i move? matrix, scored and totaled. The line under it is the part nobody does by hand: the exact weight change that would flip the winner.
Sensible city wins at 67%. Lower Cost of living by 7 points and Exciting city wins instead.
The criterion expats consistently underweight before moving and overweight after. Score the effort of rebuilding it, not the fantasy of instantly having it.
Weight this for the career you'll plausibly have in five years, not the one city brochures sell. Remote work changed this criterion's meaning — score it for your industry.
The hundred small frictions of a place beat the ten big ones. A 40-minute commute is a criterion wearing a disguise.
People fall in love with cities on vacation — restaurant density, skyline, buzz. You'll spend most of your life in the Tuesday version: grocery runs, commutes, where your friends actually live. Score the Tuesday.
Moving decisions quietly assume the move. Include 'stay here' as a scored option with its own honest numbers. If staying wins the matrix, the question changes from 'where?' to 'why am I restless?' — a cheaper problem to solve.
A city is a five-to-ten-year commitment wearing a one-year lease. Weight 'long-term fit' — partners, kids, aging parents, industry shifts — higher than feels natural. Your future self is the biggest stakeholder without a vote.
From data where possible (rent ratios, salaries, commute times) and from structured visits where not: spend a normal week, not a tourist weekend, and write scores down on the flight home. The matrix forgives imperfect scores; it doesn't forgive unstated assumptions.
Convert it to what it buys: hours of your life. If the expensive city costs you 10 extra working hours a week, that's not a money criterion anymore — it's a time criterion, and should be weighted like one.
Keep one matrix, but build it together — argue about the weights, not the relationship. Flipweight panels let each person weight the criteria blind, so you can see where you actually disagree instead of guessing.